The complaint comes from some associations Marche, after a letter to school officials by the Heads of Territorial Zone of Jesi (Ancona), in which he requested that there be guaranteed to verify IEP, Individualized Education Plan, "only for pupils with special difficulties", taking account of user growth and declining workforce. Yet the test is not "an option" but a right for all children with disabilities and their families and what should be done, however, would just like to publicly denounce the shortage is causing serious risks to the ' provision of mandatory services. A review of the IEP, therefore, should be paid to all as it should be, always putting at the center only needs and rights of students with disabilities "With dismay - Fabio wrote Ragaini, associations representing the Marches Solidarity Group, and The Mosaic ANFFAS Jesi (National Association of Families of People with Intellectual Disabilities and / or Relational), addressing the leaders of the five Territorial Zone of Jesi (Ancona) - we read the letter sent last April 22 by the School Administrator the Head UMEE (Multidisciplinary Unit Children and Adolescents) Zone 5 where it aims to managers themselves, given the growth of users and the workforce is declining, "to ensure the verification of the IEP [Individualized Education Plan, ed] only for pupils with special difficulties, for which you may need to be planning new operations or the redefinition of the objectives already set. "But what are these" particular difficulties "? and pupils" without any particular difficulty "are therefore less in need of verification?.
In fact, according Ragaini and associations represented in his letter, it is clearly" a a very serious proposal, which has perhaps not fully aware, as it is believed to waive a function not optional but obligatory. It's just worth noting that consideration of the PEI is not a private matter between Territorial Zone 5 of Jesi and Schools, but involves the towns and especially about the students and their families who are entitled to receive the "performance" so it is quite paradoxical that in the face of organizational difficulties and staff shortages will react thinking - looking for an agreement with another entity - of sacrificing the user. "
drift is of concern, in short, while it should instead condemn "forcefully, publicly, that the shortage possible risks to the delivery of mandatory services' as well as implementing" organizational arrangements designed to fully meet the needs of people with disabilities , putting them - not the disruption of services and staff - in the center. "
But there is another aspect that emerges from the second Ragaini letter to school officials by the head of the Territorial Zone UMEE 5 di Jesi and the very value of performance represented the processing of the PEI.
"There is the appearance of formal and substantial," is written. "Obviously the first is not to be dismissed, but must be filled out. And perhaps this is the real problem should be tackled rigorously by Zone 5, Municipalities and School. Many experts, including families, have commented that "do or not do the verification of the PEI does not change much, unfortunately." And it is this aspect that needs serious dramatically to reflect in particular the services to disable the Zone 5. "
In essence, the statement concludes, "Checks must be made as they should, the organic should be increased, the organizational difficulties must be resolved, but we must, finally, that the substantial addition to the formal, really putting the center's needs and rights of pupils. It is this commitment that we are waiting to be paid, without ambiguity. " (SB)
Source Superando.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment